Skip to main content

Week 9,

Online Argument: Why the anti-lawn movement bugs me a little

Graphic made by me


Why did you choose this online argument:

I don't use FB, or twitter much so I decided to just find an article that has an argument that interests me. Chose this article because it offers a discussion on the environmental and landscaping debate. It goes beyond a simple pro/con argument, instead of taking an extreme stance, the author goes for a middle ground in the lawn-versus-no-lawn discussion. I’ve been thinking about talking to my family about replacing our lawn at home with native flowers, ornamentals, and fruits or vegetables. 

Concerns:

Incomplete Cost Analysis: 

The author critiques the anti-lawn movement as potentially classist, arguing that only certain people can afford to adopt a no-lawn lifestyle. However, their cost breakdownis weak. For instance, they calculate the cost of replacing a lawn with liriope but only account for the upfront cost of the plants. They completely overlook long-term savings on water, reduced maintenance, and the ecological benefits associated with alternative landscaping. 

Limited Environmental Perspective: 

The author passes over the bigger environmental issues tied to traditional lawns. While they mention problems like water waste and chemical runoff, they barely address larger impacts, such as habitat destruction, biodiversity loss, and the carbon footprint of maintaining a grass lawn. 

Contradictions in Environmental Claims: 

The author claims to be environmentally conscious, saying they don’t use irrigation or chemicals. Yet, at the same time, they defend lawn culture, creating a clear contradiction. While they advocate for a "moderate" approach, they fail to fully acknowledge the significant environmental harm associated with traditional lawns. 

 

Five rule:

I’m not sure if the five rules are meant specifically for the argument we choose or if they are general rules. Since there is no back-and-forth in the argument I chose, at least in the main article, though there are some comments, I decided to focus on general rules for online arguments. 

  1. Stay respectful: Treat the other person with dignity. Avoid personal attacks, insults, or name-calling. It is very easy in an online landscape to resort to insults due to anonymity. 
  2. Listen/read carefully: Try to understand the other person's full point of view before responding. Ask clarifying questions if something isn’t clear. 
  3. Use credible sources: When critiquing or making an argument, back it up with reliable evidence from reputable sources, not just personal opinions or rumors. 
  4. Be open-minded: If presented with compelling evidence, be willing to change your views and admit when you might be wrong. 
  5. Keep your emotions in check: This is closely tied to staying respectful. If your emotions aren’t managed calmly and rationally, it may lead to insults or attacks on a person’s character. Avoid getting angry or defensive, even if the topic is something you feel passionate about.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 5, Business Assessment

I chose to assess Tapteal Native Plants, a local native plant nursery. They have a website, as well as Facebook and Instagram pages. Since the business focuses on native plants, their location and service area are important. They serve the Columbia Basin region of Washington. I think the Tapteal Native Plants website effectively communicates the company’s offerings and values. Right on the homepage, you see their logo, business name, a brief statement highlighting their focus on native plants, and a beautiful image showcasing some of these plants. At the top of Tapteal’s homepage, the navigation menu and logo are prominently displayed, making it easy for users to find key pages, like the seed shop, consulting and design services, and guides for caring for native plants. The middle section immediately communicates the company’s core focus on native plants, followed by highlights of their plant selection, services, and a brief 'About Us' section. At the bottom, you’ll find links ...

Week 7, Research Podcast

I'll be honest, I don’t typically listen to podcasts, and finding one about online communication was a bit challenging. While I found some connections to our class discussions, I’m still not entirely sure if I chose the best one. The episode I listened to was "Who Should Control Online Speech?" from the How to Fix the Internet podcast, featuring Daphne Keller from Stanford's Center for Internet and Society. This episode looks into the issues of content moderation, echo chambers, and the concentrated power of big tech companies, offering valuable insights into how online communication is shaped in today's digital landscape.   source: http://www.freepik.com/ In a world increasingly influenced by digital interactions, we get much of our information from platforms like Google, Facebook, and X (formerly Twitter). With so many sources fighting for our attention, an important question comes to mind, who decides what information we see online? Keller discusses this ...

Week 6, Battle For Public Opinion

The online landscape has reshaped how public opinions are formed, with one of the biggest factors being the fast speed at which information spreads. On social media, anyone can share content that influences others, whether it’s accurate or not. I experience this every day, constantly reminding my dad not to believe everything he sees on Facebook, where misinformation can spread as quickly as the truth. Content that stirs strong emotions tends to spread the fastest, making it particularly impactful. One concerning aspect of how information and content are spread is the formation of echo chambers. People often see content that aligns with their views and are less likely to encounter perspectives that differ from their own. Content and information can significantly alter people’s opinions of others, which is especially important during elections when the general public has to vote for people in power. This communication course happens to be taking place during an election, so you’ll see a...