Skip to main content

Week 2 Discussion

 

Do different social networking sites offer other benefits and drawbacks?  

I believe that different social networks offer both benefits and drawbacks. The first one that comes to mind for me is Facebook. While I don't use Facebook, I understand the benefits it provides for communicating with family members who live in other countries. For instance, my parents use Facebook to stay connected with relatives in Mexico. Before SNS, they would have to buy prepaid cards that would allow them to call numbers in Mexico. With Facebook and WhatsApp, that was no longer necessary. A drawback I see with Facebook is the spread of misinformation. I always have to remind my father not to blindly believe everything posted there and to take things with a grain of salt. 

Another social network is Instagram, which I still use. It’s similar to Facebook in that you can stay connected with friends and family members. However, a downside is the potential for addiction to the validation that comes from likes and comments on posts. There’s also the issue of infinite scrolling through Instagram Reels, a problem that TikTok and YouTube Shorts also share. 

Originally, I thought the term for scrolling through SNS like Instagram Reels and TikTok was “doomscrolling,” but that doesn’t seem to be the correct definition. While some people use it to describe the addictive nature of Instagram Reels, TikTok, and YouTube Shorts, the more accurate term is “zombie scrolling,” which I found in an article from Newport Institute, a mental health organization. 

As someone who struggles with zombie scrolling, I found a video that really opened my eyes on how to fix this issue (just a heads-up, the video contains some vulgar language). 

Do social networking sites have any responsibility in promoting mental health in their users? If so, how might they go about doing so? 

I believe that social networking sites (SNS) have a responsibility to promote mental health among their users. One thing I feel SNS platforms like Instagram and TikTok, which I believe they already do to some extent, is limit certain age groups from using their services. Younger people are more impressionable and can easily become addicted to the validation from online strangers. 

I think SNS platforms should provide users with helpful information or direct them to appropriate resources if certain concerning content is posted. For instance, I know that Instagram has pop-ups that appear when anything related to suicide, or self-harm is posted in photos or videos. Another suggestion is to allow users to set timers or limit their SNS usage to specific times. This could help prevent people from spending excessive amounts of time online, a behavior which I heard being referred to as being "chronically" or "clinically online."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 10 Social Semiotics

Social Semiotic studies how images communicate meaning. It explores how visuals are created, what they express, and how people interpret them. Images are influenced by social, cultural, and political factors, not just what the creator's intent. Their meaning depends on both the creator's and viewer's beliefs and values. Social Semiotic are important because is shows how images and text work together to convey messages. It provides tools to analyze visuals and helps people better understand and use images in communication. Social semiotic was primarily developed by Micheal Halliday, and later expanded by Gunther Kress.  Some of the rules associated with social semiotic are that people understand the world through signs, which are shaped by social and cultural norms. The meaning of the signs can change depending on the context. Different signs can be used to create meaning and choosing one over another can alter that meaning. Images create meaning in three main ways: Represen...

Week 9,

Online Argument: Why the anti-lawn movement bugs me a little Graphic made by me Why did you choose this online argument: I don't use FB, or twitter much so I decided to just find an article that has an argument that interests me. C hose this article because it offers a discussion on the environmental and landscaping debate. It goes beyond a simple pro/con argument , i nstead of taking an extreme stance, the author goes for a middle ground in the lawn-versus-no-lawn discussion. I ’ve been thinking about talking to my family about replacing our lawn at home with native flowers, ornamentals, and fruits or vegetables.   Concerns: Incomplete Cost Analysis:   The author critiques the anti-lawn movement as potentially classist, arguing that only certain people can afford to adopt a no-lawn lifestyle. However, their cost breakdownis weak. For instance, they calculate the cost of replacing a lawn with liriope but only account for the upfront cost of the plants. They completely o...

Week 8, Toulmin method

This week's discussion is about the Toulmin method and how it can be applied in an online communication setting. First, let’s break down what the Toulmin method is. The Toulmin method is a structured way to construct an argument, consisting of six components. The three main components are claims , grounds , and warrants , while the additional three components qualifiers , rebuttals , and backing are optional but can enhance an argument when needed. Graphic made by me using the Purdue Toulmin Argument graphics as guide   Main Components: Claim : The main assertion or conclusion of an argument. Example: A claim could be, "Drinking water is essential for good health." Grounds : The evidence, facts, or data supporting the claim. Example: Evidence for this claim includes that water helps maintain body temperature, removes waste, and supports organ function. Warrant : The reasoning that connects the data to the claim. Example: The warrant here is that the human body relies on...