Skip to main content

Week 6, Battle For Public Opinion

The online landscape has reshaped how public opinions are formed, with one of the biggest factors being the fast speed at which information spreads. On social media, anyone can share content that influences others, whether it’s accurate or not. I experience this every day, constantly reminding my dad not to believe everything he sees on Facebook, where misinformation can spread as quickly as the truth. Content that stirs strong emotions tends to spread the fastest, making it particularly impactful.

One concerning aspect of how information and content are spread is the formation of echo chambers. People often see content that aligns with their views and are less likely to encounter perspectives that differ from their own. Content and information can significantly alter people’s opinions of others, which is especially important during elections when the general public has to vote for people in power. This communication course happens to be taking place during an election, so you’ll see ads and posts trying to defame other candidates. The rapid speed at which information and content spread is concerning because, along with real and factual information, false information can also circulate quickly. For example, not too long ago, false information spread about migrants eating dogs and cats in Springfield, Ohio. The fast spread of information makes it harder to discern truth from falsehood. As information flows so easily and echo chambers grow, people seem to become more divided. This polarization makes understanding one another harder.

One example of a controversial online campaign involved trolling the general public. Back in 2014, Apple released its new iOS 8 software for iPhones. 4chan, an anonymous message board, decided to create a convincing fake advertisement promoting a feature called “Wave” in the iOS 8 update, which supposedly allowed users to charge their phones in a microwave. The ad was released and quickly spread online, and it’s said that a few people fell for the hoax and actually microwaved their iPhones, completely destroying them.

Wave AD

Individuals and organizations need to consider many things before posting or sharing information and content. The most important factor is to verify the truth of the information before sharing it. For individuals, it's essential to think about what you post, how it might affect others, and to consider different viewpoints when consuming information or content. Taking breaks from social media can also be beneficial, for example, I’ve personally try to stay off Facebook, Twitter (X), and Instagram over the past few months due to the overwhelming amount of election-related information.


PCMag. (n.d.). Definition of IOS 8 wave prank. PCMAG. https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/ios-8-wave-prank

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 10 Social Semiotics

Social Semiotic studies how images communicate meaning. It explores how visuals are created, what they express, and how people interpret them. Images are influenced by social, cultural, and political factors, not just what the creator's intent. Their meaning depends on both the creator's and viewer's beliefs and values. Social Semiotic are important because is shows how images and text work together to convey messages. It provides tools to analyze visuals and helps people better understand and use images in communication. Social semiotic was primarily developed by Micheal Halliday, and later expanded by Gunther Kress.  Some of the rules associated with social semiotic are that people understand the world through signs, which are shaped by social and cultural norms. The meaning of the signs can change depending on the context. Different signs can be used to create meaning and choosing one over another can alter that meaning. Images create meaning in three main ways: Represen...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 9,

Online Argument: Why the anti-lawn movement bugs me a little Graphic made by me Why did you choose this online argument: I don't use FB, or twitter much so I decided to just find an article that has an argument that interests me. C hose this article because it offers a discussion on the environmental and landscaping debate. It goes beyond a simple pro/con argument , i nstead of taking an extreme stance, the author goes for a middle ground in the lawn-versus-no-lawn discussion. I ’ve been thinking about talking to my family about replacing our lawn at home with native flowers, ornamentals, and fruits or vegetables.   Concerns: Incomplete Cost Analysis:   The author critiques the anti-lawn movement as potentially classist, arguing that only certain people can afford to adopt a no-lawn lifestyle. However, their cost breakdownis weak. For instance, they calculate the cost of replacing a lawn with liriope but only account for the upfront cost of the plants. They completely o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 8, Toulmin method

This week's discussion is about the Toulmin method and how it can be applied in an online communication setting. First, let’s break down what the Toulmin method is. The Toulmin method is a structured way to construct an argument, consisting of six components. The three main components are claims , grounds , and warrants , while the additional three components qualifiers , rebuttals , and backing are optional but can enhance an argument when needed. Graphic made by me using the Purdue Toulmin Argument graphics as guide   Main Components: Claim : The main assertion or conclusion of an argument. Example: A claim could be, "Drinking water is essential for good health." Grounds : The evidence, facts, or data supporting the claim. Example: Evidence for this claim includes that water helps maintain body temperature, removes waste, and supports organ function. Warrant : The reasoning that connects the data to the claim. Example: The warrant here is that the human body relies on...
Post a Comment
Read more