Skip to main content

Week 7, Research Podcast

I'll be honest, I don’t typically listen to podcasts, and finding one about online communication was a bit challenging. While I found some connections to our class discussions, I’m still not entirely sure if I chose the best one. The episode I listened to was "Who Should Control Online Speech?" from the How to Fix the Internet podcast, featuring Daphne Keller from Stanford's Center for Internet and Society. This episode looks into the issues of content moderation, echo chambers, and the concentrated power of big tech companies, offering valuable insights into how online communication is shaped in today's digital landscape.

 

source: http://www.freepik.com/

In a world increasingly influenced by digital interactions, we get much of our information from platforms like Google, Facebook, and X (formerly Twitter). With so many sources fighting for our attention, an important question comes to mind, who decides what information we see online? Keller discusses this issue, highlighting how big tech companies now control much of our public discourse by managing what is visible on their platforms. This shift from an "internet of widely distributed nodes of speech" to one dominated by a few companies (Cohn & O'Brien, 2021) raises concerns about private control over spaces meant for public discourse. 
 
One of the main topics explored is the reliance on automated systems for content moderation, which often fails to account for context. Keller emphasizes that these systems, while necessary at scale, can be imperfect and even harmful. The podcast also examines solution to the problem of content moderation by creating smaller, community-driven spaces and developing middleware that enables users to select their content moderation preferences. While this could mitigate big tech's influence, it also risks reinforcing echo chambers, a topic we discussed in class. As smaller communities might cater to specific viewpoints, limiting exposure to diverse perspectives and factual information  (Seyler & Brizee, 2018).  
 
In our fast-paced world, where information flows continuously, it’s crucial to consider how we shape and protect online communication spaces. Ensuring a more equal and healthy digital environment. Rather than allowing a few powerful tech companies to determine the internet future, we should aim for a more democratic, distributed digital landscape that serves everyone, not just those with the most resources or the loudest voices but without intervention, we risk perpetuating and deepening existing societal divides through our digital infrastructure, so finding a balance is essential. 

  

Cohn, C., & O'Brien, D. (Hosts). (2021, November 30). Who should control online speech? (No. 103) [Audio podcast episode]. In How to fix the internet. Electronic Frontier Foundation. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/11/podcast-episode-putting-people-control-online-speech 
 
Seyler, D. U., & Brizee, A. (2018). Read, reason, write: An argument text and reader (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 10 Social Semiotics

Social Semiotic studies how images communicate meaning. It explores how visuals are created, what they express, and how people interpret them. Images are influenced by social, cultural, and political factors, not just what the creator's intent. Their meaning depends on both the creator's and viewer's beliefs and values. Social Semiotic are important because is shows how images and text work together to convey messages. It provides tools to analyze visuals and helps people better understand and use images in communication. Social semiotic was primarily developed by Micheal Halliday, and later expanded by Gunther Kress.  Some of the rules associated with social semiotic are that people understand the world through signs, which are shaped by social and cultural norms. The meaning of the signs can change depending on the context. Different signs can be used to create meaning and choosing one over another can alter that meaning. Images create meaning in three main ways: Represen...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 9,

Online Argument: Why the anti-lawn movement bugs me a little Graphic made by me Why did you choose this online argument: I don't use FB, or twitter much so I decided to just find an article that has an argument that interests me. C hose this article because it offers a discussion on the environmental and landscaping debate. It goes beyond a simple pro/con argument , i nstead of taking an extreme stance, the author goes for a middle ground in the lawn-versus-no-lawn discussion. I ’ve been thinking about talking to my family about replacing our lawn at home with native flowers, ornamentals, and fruits or vegetables.   Concerns: Incomplete Cost Analysis:   The author critiques the anti-lawn movement as potentially classist, arguing that only certain people can afford to adopt a no-lawn lifestyle. However, their cost breakdownis weak. For instance, they calculate the cost of replacing a lawn with liriope but only account for the upfront cost of the plants. They completely o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 8, Toulmin method

This week's discussion is about the Toulmin method and how it can be applied in an online communication setting. First, let’s break down what the Toulmin method is. The Toulmin method is a structured way to construct an argument, consisting of six components. The three main components are claims , grounds , and warrants , while the additional three components qualifiers , rebuttals , and backing are optional but can enhance an argument when needed. Graphic made by me using the Purdue Toulmin Argument graphics as guide   Main Components: Claim : The main assertion or conclusion of an argument. Example: A claim could be, "Drinking water is essential for good health." Grounds : The evidence, facts, or data supporting the claim. Example: Evidence for this claim includes that water helps maintain body temperature, removes waste, and supports organ function. Warrant : The reasoning that connects the data to the claim. Example: The warrant here is that the human body relies on...
Post a Comment
Read more